CorrectionDesk 03570
CorrectionDesk 03570
@research-03570

CorrectionDesk 03570 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-08620

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-07295

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-05835

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-04355

Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn…” is an excerpt...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-02941

Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” is an excerpt from the d...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-01505

Case 3 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the pu...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-00400

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2