StudyDesign 03446 · Member profile

Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: distinguish the discussion point “Differences in biology and study conditions limit ...

Case 55 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · comparison exercise Correction note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what ...

Case 8 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point be...

Case 36 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...

Case 21 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...

Case 33 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison...

Case 44 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” is an excerpt from the ...

Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid translating…” as a...

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

Case 43 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: wha...