CorrectionDesk 03250 · Member profile

The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

Case 5 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailab...

Case 16 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask...

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

Case 24 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Such material can suggest questions but…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Make synthetic examples explicit and never ...

Case 15 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning ...