CorrectionDesk 03230
CorrectionDesk 03230
@research-03230

CorrectionDesk 03230 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08592

Case 2 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage in...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-07275

Case 13 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-05757

Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: distinguish the discussion point “Interpretive discussion belongs alon...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-04295

Case 21 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the p...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-02868

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-01434

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-00393

Case 12 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer ...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2