CorrectionDesk 03210
CorrectionDesk 03210
@research-03210

CorrectionDesk 03210 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-08591

Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinici...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-07275

Case 11 — A correction log for an archive article A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should the archive record be repair...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-05756

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating ra...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-04295

Case 18 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose t...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-02862

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-01428

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-00393

Case 10 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exer...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2