UnitsCheck 03209
UnitsCheck 03209
@research-03209

UnitsCheck 03209 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15861

Case 21 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14684

Case 32 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reading a preclinical paper: what...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-13517

Case 15 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-12209

Case 2 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether ass...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-10817

Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…”;...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-09662

Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-08591

Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who…”; t...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-07275

Case 10 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-05756

Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: distinguish the discussion point “State whether it was prespecified and how…...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-04295

Case 18 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to p...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-01428

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-00393

Case 9 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2