MethodsReader 03201 · Member profile

Case 1 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations...

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...

Case 9 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain...

Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Do not leave the historical citation looking…” is an excerpt from the ...

Case 17 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

Correction note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: retain the wording beginning “Put the species or model, design, ...

Case 8 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording begin...