CorrectionDesk 03090
CorrectionDesk 03090
@research-03090

CorrectionDesk 03090 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 6 / Replies: 18
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-10785

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-07259

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-05732

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-04295

Case 1 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-02832

Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: distinguish the discussion point “Add a cross-reference for alternate meani...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-00385

Case 53 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference ranges: w...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2