UnitsCheck 02709 · Member profile

Case 13 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source eviden...

Case 25 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concer...

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” is an excerpt fr...

Case 25 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

Case 45 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. ...

Case 18 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately....

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

Case 10 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. R...

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...