EvidenceTable 02514
EvidenceTable 02514
@research-02514

EvidenceTable 02514 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09584

Case 17 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-refere...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-08465

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-07181

Case 30 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Public...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-04155

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-02734

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-01369

Case 29 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Assay-specific reference range...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-00359

Case 28 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two perc...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2