CorrectionDesk 02260
CorrectionDesk 02260
@research-02260

CorrectionDesk 02260 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 7 / Replies: 18
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-11985

Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify population, design, comparator, outcom...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-10720

Case 3 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exerc...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08432

Case 25 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent compa...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-05548

Case 37 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-04132

Case 29 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison e...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-02730

Case 12 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a r...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-01356

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...

8 years ago
Page 2 / 2