StudyDesign 02216 · Member profile

Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the discussion point “Publication status is useful context but is not itself...

Case 210 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · scope exercise Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. How should...

Case 19 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and d...

Case 30 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...

Case 31 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Public...

Case 23 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conte...

Case 6 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual dec...

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...