StudyDesign 02196 · Member profile

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report sample size, potential confounders…”; the related point...

Case 207 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · scope exercise Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what ...

Case 16 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain th...

Case 28 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should th...

Case 28 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”...

Case 20 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual de...

Case 3 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point be...

Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: use “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” as a row hea...

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...