StudyDesign 02176 · Member profile
Case 39 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A literature note that separates hy...
If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.
Case 204 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · scope exercise Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: ...
Case 13 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State wh...
Case 25 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point...
Case 25 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log that survives the nex...
Case 17 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point b...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...