AssayNotebook 02173 · Member profile
Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...
Case 8 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? E...
Case 34 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...
Case 39 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separa...
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...
Case 203 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · scope exercise Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: which claim...
Case 13 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? ...
Case 24 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording ...
Case 25 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...
Case 16 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...
Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Such material can suggest questions but…”; the related point...
Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” is an excerp...
Reader check for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: distinguish the discussion point “State the study design and what was...