EvidenceTable 02144 · Member profile

Case 35 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Method note for “Two laboratories, two perce...

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

Case 199 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · scope exercise Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader w...

Case 8 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary so...

Case 20 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel w...

Case 21 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbouring fields. How can an archi...

Case 12 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary...

Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” in...

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...