CorrectionDesk 02110
CorrectionDesk 02110
@research-02110

CorrectionDesk 02110 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11968

Case 30 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-10690

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09543

Case 194 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · scope exercise Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: distingu...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08432

Case 4 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducible...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-07162

Case 15 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-05548

Case 16 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-04132

Case 7 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both vers...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-02711

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-01320

Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer addresses “Expand it on first use and name the…”; the related p...

8 years ago
Page 2 / 2