StudyDesign 01966
StudyDesign 01966
@research-01966

StudyDesign 01966 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11968

Case 9 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-10655

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09543

Case 174 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · reader check exercise Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the labe...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-08395

Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-07152

Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Expand it on first use and name the…” is an excerpt from the discuss...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-05542

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-04109

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-02679

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-01284

Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: distinguish the discussion point “Statistical significance alone does not es...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-00298

Case 32 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2