UnitsCheck 01709 · Member profile

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

Case 24 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

Case 25 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain ...

Case 17 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording ...

Case 137 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · correction exercise Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: reta...

Case 22 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answe...

Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: the point beginning “Use separate entries for the internal transcription c...

Case 21 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

Case 2 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A reagent dossier contains a summary purity percentage but not the method...

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...