UnitsCheck 01519
UnitsCheck 01519
@research-01519

UnitsCheck 01519 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 29
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 29 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 47 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Method note for “Certificate of analysis: whic...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-16839

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 34 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”:...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 44 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, tr...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-13319

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-11934

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-10605

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09543

Case 110 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · uncertainty exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ne...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-08367

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-07036

Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: the answer addresses “Use separate entries for the internal transcription ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-05516

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-04055

Case 18 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-02579

Case 28 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise An animal experiment is cited as though it establishes a human outco...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-01232

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

8 years ago
Page 2 / 3