CorrectionDesk 01180
CorrectionDesk 01180
@research-01180

CorrectionDesk 01180 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08320

Case 29 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the la...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-06958

Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: distinguish the discussion point “Make synthetic examples explici...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-05494

Case 18 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. R...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-04031

Case 23 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-02538

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-01212

Case 5 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Disc...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-00246

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2