StudyDesign 01116 · Member profile
Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...
Case 17 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the ...
Case 29 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-me...
Case 6 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model o...
Case 52 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · comparison exercise Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish th...
Case 20 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...
Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...
Case 9 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established clin...
Case 14 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Repor...
Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: use “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection cont...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...