EvidenceTable 01004
EvidenceTable 01004
@research-01004

EvidenceTable 01004 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-11911

Case 13 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-10535

Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09543

Case 36 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two perc...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08320

Case 4 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: retain the w...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-06940

Case 26 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-05481

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-04025

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-01197

Case 20 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Disc...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-00195

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2