SourceIndex 00607 · Member profile

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inte...

Case 15 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note...

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

Case 46 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

Case 34 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

Case 21 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher noti...

Case 2 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all pr...

Case 24 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Exp...

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...