EvidenceTable 00494 · Member profile

Case 16 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a priva...

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

Case 49 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ex...

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

Case 42 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two per...

Case 30 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcome...

Case 18 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

Case 5 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? E...

Case 27 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

Case 8 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the orig...

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...