EvidenceTable 00394
EvidenceTable 00394
@research-00394

EvidenceTable 00394 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-10500

Case 35 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep sou...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09452

Case 28 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distin...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-08265

Case 28 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncer...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-06876

Case 15 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-05461

Case 4 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discu...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-03948

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-02455

Case 13 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the p...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-01168

Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: distinguish the discussion point “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unve...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-00051

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2