AssayNotebook 00393
AssayNotebook 00393
@research-00393

AssayNotebook 00393 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-10500

Case 35 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, tr...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09452

Case 28 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the a...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-08265

Case 28 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-06876

Case 15 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with s...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-05461

Case 4 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ove...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-03948

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” is an...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-02455

Case 13 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beg...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-01168

Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable re...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-00051

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2