AssayNotebook 00333 · Member profile

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer ad...

Case 20 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. R...

Case 19 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction....

Case 7 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exerc...

A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note should describe its model and translation limits rather than suggesting ...

Case 22 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. How should a comparison be d...

Case 4 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link...

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

Case 29 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative...