StudyDesign 00296 · Member profile

Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…”; the related...

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

Case 21 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the ori...

Case 14 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...

Case 14 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output to...

Case 1 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the...

Case 16 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Describe the species, model and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record....

Case 24 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides...