CorrectionDesk 00270 · Member profile

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

Case 17 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavaila...

Case 11 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the pro...

Case 10 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask...

Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addresses “Record the original units and axis transformation, show ...

Case 13 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...

Case 56 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates hyp...

Case 35 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

Case 20 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the ori...