EvidenceTable 00054
EvidenceTable 00054
@research-00054

EvidenceTable 00054 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-10479

Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Locate the primary study and conf...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-09424

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-08262

Case 14 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Link th...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-06829

Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” is an excerpt from the d...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-02447

Case 25 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the a...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-01140

Case 4 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary so...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-00017

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2