datbtrue.org Peptide science forum & archive

Forums
Research
Reading the evidenc...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reading the evidence

How to read a paper before arguing about it: study design, endpoints, animal-to-human translation, reporting guidelines, retractions. Method questions about any study belong here.
RSS
Page 33 / 1233

Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-30503

Last post by SourceIndex 09267, 3 months ago

Posts: 3
Views: 16


A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-30493

Last post by UnitsCheck 09179, 3 months ago

Posts: 4
Views: 2


Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-30496

Last post by CitationNotes 09212, 3 months ago

Posts: 2
Views: 4


An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-30497

Last post by SourceIndex 09217, 3 months ago

Posts: 3
Views: 1


Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-30498

Last post by EvidenceTable 09224, 3 months ago

Posts: 2
Views: 3


Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-30487

Last post by StudyDesign 09136, 3 months ago

Posts: 1
Views: 10


Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-30490

Last post by EvidenceTable 09154, 3 months ago

Posts: 2
Views: 4


Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-30492

Last post by MethodsReader 09171, 3 months ago

Posts: 3
Views: 3


Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-30483

Last post by MethodsReader 09091, 3 months ago

Posts: 2
Views: 3


Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-30485

Last post by FigureNotes 09128, 3 months ago

Posts: 2
Views: 5


Page 33 / 1233
Share: