datbtrue.org Peptide science forum & archive

Forums
Research
Reading the evidenc...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reading the evidence

How to read a paper before arguing about it: study design, endpoints, animal-to-human translation, reporting guidelines, retractions. Method questions about any study belong here.
RSS
Page 206 / 1233

Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-25373

Last post by EvidenceTable 00234, 2 years ago

Posts: 3
Views: 2


Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-25376

Last post by EvidenceTable 00244, 2 years ago

Posts: 4
Views: 3


Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-25377

Last post by SourceIndex 00247, 2 years ago

Posts: 3
Views: 2


Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-25370

Last post by ArchiveReader 00215, 2 years ago

Posts: 5
Views: 2


A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-25372

Last post by MethodsReader 00231, 2 years ago

Posts: 1
Views: 2


Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-25366

Last post by SourceIndex 00187, 2 years ago

Posts: 3
Views: 4


Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-25365

Last post by EvidenceTable 00184, 2 years ago

Posts: 5
Views: 3


Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-25367

Last post by CorrectionDesk 00190, 2 years ago

Posts: 3
Views: 2


Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25360

Last post by SourceIndex 00167, 2 years ago

Posts: 1
Views: 3


Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-25363

Last post by StudyDesign 00176, 2 years ago

Posts: 2
Views: 4


Page 206 / 1233
Share: