Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
325
Posts
325
Users
0
Reactions
37
Views
13/09/2018 7:41 am
Case 24 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error
Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
13/09/2018 7:54 am
Case 24 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error
Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
13/09/2018 8:28 am
Case 24 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error
Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wording beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
13/09/2018 9:20 am
Case 24 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error
Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addresses “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…”; the related point is “Do not compare apparent visual distances…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
13/09/2018 10:10 am
Case 25 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise
A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the reading note cover?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-02313/25: address this question within its stated limits.
13/09/2018 10:22 am
Case 25 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise
Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
13/09/2018 11:01 am
Case 25 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
13/09/2018 11:09 am
Case 25 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise
Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
13/09/2018 11:39 am
Case 25 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise
Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
13/09/2018 11:59 am
Case 25 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise
Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…”; the related point is “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
13/09/2018 12:14 pm
Case 25 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise
Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: distinguish the discussion point “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
13/09/2018 1:12 pm
Case 26 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise
A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationship?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-02313/26: address this question within its stated limits.
13/09/2018 1:51 pm
Case 26 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise
Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
13/09/2018 2:05 pm
Case 26 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise
Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
13/09/2018 2:27 pm
Case 26 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
Share: