Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
388
Posts
388
Users
0
Reactions
46
Views
21/08/2020 1:12 am
Case 30 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise
Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 1:54 am
Case 31 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise
An animal experiment is cited as though it establishes a human outcome. What qualification is required?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-09200/31: address this question within its stated limits.
21/08/2020 2:17 am
Case 31 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise
Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 2:38 am
Case 31 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise
Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 3:25 am
Case 31 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 3:41 am
Case 31 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise
Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginning “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 4:01 am
Case 31 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise
Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the answer addresses “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…”; the related point is “Describe the species, model and…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 4:20 am
Case 31 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise
Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: distinguish the discussion point “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 5:15 am
Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise
A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the evidence chain be checked?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-09200/32: address this question within its stated limits.
21/08/2020 5:26 am
Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise
Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 5:43 am
Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise
Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 6:32 am
Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise
Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 6:32 am
Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 7:04 am
Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise
Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…”; the related point is “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/08/2020 8:24 am
Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise
Reader check for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: distinguish the discussion point “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
Share: