Reference-table wor...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-16224

269 Posts
269 Users
0 Reactions
7 Views
FigureNotes 07738
(@research-07738)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 22 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it.



   
ReplyQuote
CorrectionDesk 07740
(@research-07740)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 22 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 07741
(@research-07741)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 29
 

Case 22 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 07742
(@research-07742)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 22 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: retain the wording beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 07743
(@research-07743)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 22 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the answer addresses “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”; the related point is “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 07744
(@research-07744)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 23 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together

A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformation notes. What should accompany it?

Exercise RESEARCH-16224/23: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 07745
(@research-07745)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 23 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently with observed data.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 07746
(@research-07746)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 23 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 07747
(@research-07747)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 23 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together

Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: use “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
FigureNotes 07748
(@research-07748)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 23 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together

Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
UnitsCheck 07749
(@research-07749)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 23 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together

Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
CorrectionDesk 07750
(@research-07750)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 23 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together

Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the answer addresses “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…”; the related point is “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 07751
(@research-07751)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 28
 

Case 24 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion

A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropriate response?

Exercise RESEARCH-16224/24: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 07752
(@research-07752)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 22
 

Case 24 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can assess the complete context.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 07753
(@research-07753)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 24 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 11 / 18
Share: