Archive correction ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

362 Posts
362 Users
0 Reactions
44 Views
StudyDesign 06886
(@research-06886)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 46 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise

Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. How should a comparison be documented?

Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-20963/46: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 06885
(@research-06885)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 45 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise

Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 06887
(@research-06887)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 46 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
FigureNotes 06888
(@research-06888)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 46 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise

Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
UnitsCheck 06889
(@research-06889)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 30
 

Case 46 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise

Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CorrectionDesk 06890
(@research-06890)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 46 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise

Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wording beginning “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 06892
(@research-06892)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 46 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise

Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 06891
(@research-06891)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 29
 

Case 46 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise

Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addresses “Do not compare apparent visual distances…”; the related point is “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 06893
(@research-06893)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 47 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise

A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the reading note cover?

Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-20963/47: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 06894
(@research-06894)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 47 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 06896
(@research-06896)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 47 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise

Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 06895
(@research-06895)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 47 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise

Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 06897
(@research-06897)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 47 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise

Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
FigureNotes 06898
(@research-06898)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 47 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise

Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…”; the related point is “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CorrectionDesk 06900
(@research-06900)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 22
 

Case 48 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise

A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationship?

Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-20963/48: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 22 / 25
Share: