Literature notebook...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17722

357 Posts
357 Users
0 Reactions
32 Views
UnitsCheck 09139
(@research-09139)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 35 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise

A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised?

Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-17722/35: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 09141
(@research-09141)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 35 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 09142
(@research-09142)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 35 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise

Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 09144
(@research-09144)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 22
 

Case 35 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise

Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer addresses “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…”; the related point is “State whether it was prespecified and how…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 09143
(@research-09143)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 35 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise

Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 09145
(@research-09145)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 22
 

Case 35 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise

Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: distinguish the discussion point “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 09146
(@research-09146)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 28
 

Case 36 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observed endpoint. How can the caption be made precise?

Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-17722/36: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 09147
(@research-09147)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 21
 

Case 36 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
FigureNotes 09148
(@research-09148)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 36 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
UnitsCheck 09149
(@research-09149)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 36 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CorrectionDesk 09150
(@research-09150)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 36 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: retain the wording beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 09151
(@research-09151)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 36 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the answer addresses “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…”; the related point is “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 09152
(@research-09152)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 36 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: distinguish the discussion point “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 09154
(@research-09154)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 29
 

Case 37 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 09153
(@research-09153)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 37 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise

A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformation notes. What should accompany it?

Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-17722/37: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 17 / 24
Share: